Skip to content
  • About
  • Services
    • Phone Interview
    • Initial Meeting
    • Invention Analysis
    • Plan of Action
    • Invention Design
    • 2D/3D Illustrations
    • Invention Engineering
    • Patent Protection
    • Market Research
    • Manufacturers Search
    • Invention Brochures
    • Licensing & Royalties
  • Submit
  • Benefits
  • Blog
  • Contact
Menu
  • About
  • Services
    • Phone Interview
    • Initial Meeting
    • Invention Analysis
    • Plan of Action
    • Invention Design
    • 2D/3D Illustrations
    • Invention Engineering
    • Patent Protection
    • Market Research
    • Manufacturers Search
    • Invention Brochures
    • Licensing & Royalties
  • Submit
  • Benefits
  • Blog
  • Contact

972-402-0000

Irving, Texas

  • About
  • Services
    • Phone Interview
    • Initial Meeting
    • Invention Analysis
    • Plan of Action
    • Invention Design
    • 2D/3D Illustrations
    • Invention Engineering
    • Patent Protection
    • Market Research
    • Manufacturers Search
    • Invention Brochures
    • Licensing & Royalties
  • Submit
  • Benefits
  • Blog
  • Contact
Menu
  • About
  • Services
    • Phone Interview
    • Initial Meeting
    • Invention Analysis
    • Plan of Action
    • Invention Design
    • 2D/3D Illustrations
    • Invention Engineering
    • Patent Protection
    • Market Research
    • Manufacturers Search
    • Invention Brochures
    • Licensing & Royalties
  • Submit
  • Benefits
  • Blog
  • Contact
Free Invention Analysis

Major Patent Troll Gets Socked With Paying Patent Lawyers

  • December 23, 2015
Major Patent Troll Gets Socked With Paying Patent Lawyers

An East Texas judge has had enough of one company’s habit of filing patent lawsuits by ruling that the company must pay the fees of patent lawyers and other legal expenses of the numerous companies it sued.

U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap made the ruling against eDekka LLC, a non-practicing entity based in Plano, Texas. These types of companies are commonly referred to as patent trolls because they buy broadly worded patents cheaply from companies going out of business or looking to raise capital, but instead of creating the products protected by the patent, they use them to file patent infringement lawsuits.

According to Law360, a legal news service, eDekka filed 130 patent lawsuits against retailers in 2014. Among the more notable retailers are Nordstrom Inc., Tiffany & Co., Estee Lauder, AT&T Services Inc., and Safeway Inc.

As such, eDekka ranked number one for filing the most patent suits as a plaintiff. All the lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which is known for being plaintiff-friendly. Motions to dismiss abstract patents, such as eDekka’s, in the Eastern District of Texas have a low 27 percent win rate, versus a high 71 percent win rate nationwide.

The non-practicing entity used U.S patent number 6,266,674, titled: “Random access information retrieval utilizing user-defined labels.” The company used the patent to sue more than 200 companies in more than 160 separate lawsuits.

Originally filed in 1992 and issued in 2001, the inventor listed on the patent is Donald Hejna, whose company was Enounce. Hejna sold the patent in 2013 to eDekka.

In its lawsuit, eDekka claimed the retailers used a shopping cart functionality on their websites that infringed on the patent. However, there is no mention of shopping cart functionality or e-commerce anywhere in the patent, including the abstract, claims, technical field of the invention, background of the invention, brief description of the drawings, summary of the invention, or detailed description sections.

In issuing his order, Judge Gilstrap said the behavior of eDekka LLC demonstrated “an aggressive strategy” and was “exceptional.” Therefore, eDekka should pay all legal fees, including those of the patent lawyers representing the companies it sued.

It is the first time Judge Gilstrap has ever ordered a plaintiff in a patent lawsuit to pay defendants’ legal fees. The ruling throws out 168 cases brought by the patent troll.

In the ruling, Judge Gilstrap wrote, “The ‘674 patent claims were clearly directed toward unpatentable subject matter, and no reasonable litigant could have reasonably expected success on the merits when defending against the numerous § 101 motions filed in this case. However, rather than acknowledging the inherent weaknesses of the ‘674 patent, eDekka proffered completely untenable arguments to the Court.”

Although eDekka attorneys argued that the intent of the patent is to “improve the functioning of technology,” the judge ruled such improvements were not present in the patent application. Judge Gilstrap added that none of the claims made in the lawsuit met the standard for patenting.

Numerous patent attorneys have been vocal about the problems patent trolls have on the patent system. Several companies, including Google, are taking measures to thwart such trolls, but they continue to be the most active in patent infringement litigation.

The U.S. Congress has been working on legislation to reduce abusive patent litigation, but those efforts have stalled.

  • Patent Laws, patent wars, Patents, USPTO
Inventions
Tech

Latest Posts

New patent reveals Facebook is exploring a modular phone
New patent reveals Facebook is exploring a modular phone
Facebook is exploring new handheld gadget with interchangeable parts that could used like a smartphone or portable speaker, a new ...
Should the Patent and Trademark Office Be Allowed to Change Its Mind?
Should the Patent and Trademark Office Be Allowed to Change Its Mind?
A patent on one-click checkout? On a method for exercising a cat? On a lawn bag that looks like a ...
Provisional Patent Applications: To File or Not File
Provisional Patent Applications: To File or Not File
Since 1995, the United States has allowed patent applicants to file provisional applications as an alternative to filing non-provisional utility ...
Joint 3D scanning-3D printing device officially receives US patent
Joint 3D scanning-3D printing device officially receives US patent
Separate devices for 3D scanning and 3D printing could soon be a thing of the past, according to a new ...
Facebook seeks patent for payment system
Facebook seeks patent for payment system
Facebook has moved the country’s patent office seeking patent for its invention relating to a transactional payment system that allows ...
Practical Pointers for managing Patents
Practical Pointers for managing Patents
Adopting good house keeping practices is a prerequisite to efficient management of patents. To avoid costly mistakes while prosecuting and ...
Previous
Next
View all Posts

What's on Your Mind?

Submit your Idea for your Free
Patent Search Now.

FREE PATENT SEARCH
  • 972.402.0000
  • [email protected]

What's on Your Mind?

Submit your Idea for your Free
Patent Search Now.

FREE PATENT SEARCH
  • 972.402.0000
  • [email protected]

Give Us a Call

972.402.0000

Evaluate

  • Phone Interview
  • Initial Meeting
  • Invention Analysis
  • Plan of Action

Develop

  • Invention Design
  • 2D/3D Illustrations
  • Invention Engineering
  • Patent Protection

Launch

  • Market Research
  • Manufacturers Search
  • Invention Brochures
  • Licensing & Royalties

Address

6565 N.MacArthur Blvd, Irving, Texas 75039

Phone

972.402.0000

800.962.3032

972.402.0095

Email

[email protected]

Evaluate

  • Phone Interview
  • Office Meeting
  • Invention Analysis
  • Plan of Action

Develop

  • Invention Design
  • 2D/3D Illustrations
  • Invention Engineering
  • Patent Protection

Launch

  • Market Research
  • Manufacturers Search
  • Invention Brochures
  • Licensing & Royalties

Follow Us

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin-in Pinterest-p Twitter
© 2022, Lonestar Patent Services, Inc.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Free Invention Analysis

×

Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

This agreement keeps your idea safe between you and Lonestar Patent Services.

I understand that the product idea information I submit cannot be used, disclosed or sold without my express written permission. I also understand that all Lonestar Patent Services employees are required to sign an ethics and confidentiality agreement for my protection. I believe that I am the original inventor of the idea described herein. I authorize Lonestar Patent Services to review my idea and contact me in 3 to 5 business days with the results. I acknowledge that Lonestar Patent Services monitors and records telephone calls for quality assurance. I understand that Lonestar Patent Services does not promise any financial gain from the development of any new product idea.

By clicking the “submit” button below as my electronic signature, I expressly consent to being contacted about Lonestar Patent Services by phone call, auto-dialed phone call including prerecorded voice messages, text messages or email at any number or email address I provide. I understand that my consent is not a requirement for purchase of services.

Fee based service.